Fresh scrutiny has befallen the AFL’s score review system following a contentious decision during the Round 9 match between the Melbourne Demons and the Carlton Blues on May 9. Despite the Blues securing victory by a mere point, a third-quarter umpiring ruling left the Demons aggrieved post-match.
The incident revolved around Charlie Curnow’s goal, contested by Melbourne defender Steven May, who claimed to have touched the ball before it crossed the goalpost. However, the score review system’s initial assessment was inconclusive, delaying a definitive decision.
Various video replays failed to provide conclusive evidence, with one angle suggesting May’s finger may have brushed the ball, albeit indistinctly. Despite May’s assertions and the inconclusive review, the goal was awarded to Carlton.
The AFL’s score review system was introduced to ensure fair outcomes, yet it has been marred by recurrent issues, including frequent inconclusive verdicts and time-consuming delays. Despite technological advancements, the angles available for review often lack the clarity necessary for conclusive rulings, casting doubt on the system’s accuracy.
In this recent debacle, the decision proved pivotal as Carlton clinched a narrow 77-76 victory, marking the Demons’ third loss of the season. Meanwhile, Melbourne Demons forward Christian Petracca showcased a remarkable performance despite his team’s defeat, notching a career-best five goals during the match against Carlton Blues on May 9.
Petracca’s stellar performance spearheaded a valiant comeback effort for the Demons after a lackluster first quarter. With two goals and a behind in the second quarter, another pair of goals in the third, and a final goal in the last quarter, Petracca’s contribution stood out amidst the thrilling encounter at the Melbourne Cricket Ground.
